Withdrawal Military - US soldiers wait for their helicopter flight at an Afghan National Army (ANA) base in Logar province, Afghanistan [Omer Sobhani/Reuters]
U.S. troops have begun withdrawing from Afghanistan in an initial troop withdrawal called for in the U.S.-Taliban deal, a spokesman for U.S. forces in Afghanistan said Monday amid political chaos in Kabul that threatens the deal.
Withdrawal Military
According to the statement of the spokesman for the American forces in Afghanistan, Colonel Sonny Leggett, the United States will reduce the number of troops in the country to 8,600.
France Completes Withdrawal From Mali As Last Army Unit Pulls Out
Leggett said: "In accordance with the US-Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Joint Statement and the US-Taliban Agreement, USFOR-A will begin reducing its strength to 8,600 personnel within 135 days, depending on circumstances." The statement was quoted by American media.
"USFOR maintains all military assets and powers to achieve our objectives -- including conducting counterterrorism operations against al-Qaeda and ISIS-K and providing support to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces," he said. "USFOR-A is on track to achieve targeted force levels while maintaining required capabilities."
The withdrawal came as the leaders of Afghanistan's rivals were each sworn in at separate ceremonies on Monday, creating confusion for the United States as it grapples with how to proceed with an agreement signed late last month to ending the 18-year war.
Political crisis or not, a president in Kabul or two, the US is wasting no time - the withdrawal of 8,600 in 135 days has officially begun, the US military said in a statement. pic.twitter.com/0sSjWnf1Yx — Mujib Mashal (@MujMash) March 9, 2020
Roundup: The Failed Us Withdrawal From Afghanistan
Fierce disagreements between President Ashraf Ghani, who was declared the winner of the election last September, and his rival Abdullah Abdullah, who has accused the Election Complaints Commission of fraud during the vote, threaten to derail important future steps and even threaten to cross the border. there is new algebra
The US has not tied the withdrawal to political stability in Afghanistan or any specific outcome of the pan-Afghan peace talks. Instead, it depends on the Taliban gathering to prevent "any group or individual, including al Qaeda, from using Afghan territory to threaten the security of the United States and its allies."
According to the peace agreement, the withdrawal of US troops was to begin within 10 days after the agreement was signed on 29 February. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said on March 2 that he had already approved the start of the withdrawal, which would then be coordinated by the military. commanders in Afghanistan.
The U.S. official said the troops who have left now are scheduled to leave, but they will not be replaced. Esper said the head of the United States in Kabul, Gen. Scott Miller, will halt the withdrawal and evaluate conditions once troop levels drop to 8,600.
Us Military Ordered To Withdraw About Half The Troops In Afghanistan
The long-term plan is for the US to withdraw all troops within 14 months if security conditions are met.
The agreement with the Taliban came after a seven-day "reduction of violence" period that the Trump administration said was intended to test the Taliban's seriousness in moving toward a final peace deal. A Strategy A complete withdrawal from Afghanistan is a costly mistake and a failure of leadership.
U.S. Army soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division collect their bags at Fort Drum, New York, after returning home from Afghanistan on December 10, 2020. John Moore/Getty Images
US President Joe Biden's decision to withdraw the remaining US military forces from Afghanistan is more about domestic politics than national security strategy. In 2020, he campaigned on this issue. "It is time for the eternal war to end," he said last week. We must "focus on the reason we went in the first place: to make sure that Afghanistan is not used as a base to attack our country again. We did that. We achieved that goal."
Units Recognized For Afghanistan Withdrawal Mission
Biden looks like his predecessor Donald Trump, who I served as National Security Advisor. This is not a surprise since Biden is carrying out Trump's policies with only minor changes. Media coverage of Biden's April 14 announcement indicated broad public support for the implementation. The American people are tired of foreign military engagements, or so experts tell us; they are tired of Afghanistan, they are tired of Iraq, they are tired of Syria, they are tired of terrorism, they are tired of the Middle East – they are just tired. The chatterbox agrees, academics agree, Democrats almost agree, and even some Republicans agree.
The primary national security goal that all American leaders must pursue is to define their country's strategic interests and how they must be protected. Politicians must then adjust how they propose to defend the country against external threats and mobilize the necessary resources. When leaders fail to explain the hard truths, public decision-making falters, which politicians then use to justify their reluctance to make hard decisions. In effect, weak politicians substitute cause for effect and place the responsibility on the people instead of themselves. Under Trump and former President Barack Obama, and now perhaps Biden, it was not the people who were weak, but their leaders who were unwilling or unable to do their jobs.
Afghanistan proves this. If the Taliban return to power in all or most of the country, the near-universal view in Washington today is that al Qaeda, the Islamic State and others will resume using Afghanistan as a base of operations. On April 14, Biden said that terrorism has evolved since the attack on the Taliban in 2001 and that "the threat has become more widespread and is spreading around the world." Of course there is. Because the US and its NATO allies have denied Al Qaeda their preferred safe haven for 20 years. Terrorists had to go elsewhere, to the anarchic regions of the Middle East or Africa, because they had no choice. But make no mistake: Afghanistan, especially further away from the US, is their preferred destination.
In Biden's own words, the United States clearly cannot "ensure" that terrorists never again use a Taliban-dominated Afghanistan as a base to attack the American homeland. Biden acknowledges this threat, saying the United States will maintain "our counterterrorism capabilities and our critical assets in the region" to defend against a future attack. However, the overwhelming geography shows that Biden is wrong to believe that the United States can have effective counterterrorism and intelligence-gathering capabilities after leaving Afghanistan. After being expelled from other countries, Osama bin Laden settled there precisely because its remoteness appealed to him. The map has not changed.
For Biden, An Anguishing Choice On Withdrawal From Afghanistan
And what exactly is the US doing in Afghanistan today? For the withdrawal supporters, it has been an endless, daily, bloody war for 20 years. But this narrative is false, especially in the last seven years since the transition of NATO's international security force to Operation Resolute Support. Afghanistan is very dangerous and there are casualties, but the last US death occurred in February 2020. Furthermore, there is no evidence of any real economic savings from withdrawing nearly 3,500 US military personnel; Washington's costs may increase after the withdrawal because of the greater distance to be covered for any future operations.
In addition, US allies perform a key mission in Afghanistan: training, advising and assisting the Afghan National Army and other security forces. This is not a war. About 10,000 troops from NATO members and non-members are deployed as part of Resolute Support, a significantly reduced presence from the top 130,000-strong international security force. .
Of course, the US has spent huge sums on Afghanistan's so-called nation-building activities, which have something valuable to show for it. It should never have been America's goal to build a Central Asian Switzerland, even if it had the ability, which it does not. But it is an even more serious mistake to conclude that because Washington has already spent resources on the wrong target, withdrawal is now justified. The US hasn't done nation-building in years, and it's long past these costly mistakes.
Supporters of the withdrawal emphasize that the US has tried to enable the Afghans to defend themselves and that US responsibility has ended. Those who make this argument miss the bottom line that it is US security at stake, not Afghan military prowess. Washington and its allies are not defending Afghans against the Taliban just for their own sake, but to defend against the terrorist threats against Western countries that have been and will again emerge from Afghanistan under Taliban control.
Taliban Celebrates In Kabul As Us Completes Military Withdrawal
To that end, the United States focuses on gathering information about possible terrorist threats through a variety of mechanisms, not just military. However, it is a significant military presence and logistical base that does much of this critical work. And it is the domestic US armed forces, which can grow rapidly, that ensure that as long as the US remains, no persistent terrorist threat can re-emerge. Disarmament removes a great prejudice.
Biden secretly admitted that the US
Wisp broom discount, wisp lift tickets discount, homeowners insurance military discount, wisp resort military discount, wisp resort discount code, wisp discount tickets, wisp discount, wisp medication discount code, wisp discount code, wisp medicine discount code, discount code for wisp, verizon military discount
0 Comments